Numerous individuals have expressed
a
profound interest in finding out
through Internet resources, whether or not Americans
actually landed on the Moon. These searches go back to " the beginning
of the Internet and stretch back to "the original lunar
landing(s)"
BCC Meteorites, using hard copy printed materials and analysis of
meteorite lab data as a launching pad
can make the following assumptions and conclusions based on years of
studying both the purported landings and NASA, the agency making the
claim(s). Based on all of the information available and personal
knowledge of a plethora of scientific misconduct by falsification and
fabrication by NASA funded scientists we make the following
conclusion(s);
A) BCC Meteorites has found substantial valid
evidence to show that NASA
landed
humans on the Moon in July of 1969.
B) BCC Meteorites has not found
the necessary evidence to confirm any lunar landings after July of
1969, or the evidence is scant, flimsy, or non-existent.
C) Conclusion B is bolstered by
evidence of scientific
misconduct in such things as mis-identification of the Takysie Lake
lunar sample,
which was the result of a combination of motive and
opportunity on the part of agency scientists, and set in motion for the
purpose of not disturbing the Apollo program. Dr. Ninninger
according
to Steve Shoner insisted to his last breath that he had found a lunar
meteorite strewn field. In 2002 BCC Meteorites examined his samples and
discovered Dr. Ninninger was correct.
D) In 2000 an agency scientist, Dr. Everett K. Gibson operating out of
the Johnson Space Center, intentionally mis-identified BCC9601 a
new lunar meteorite, as part of a program seeded by UT Austin
scientist
Dr. Mark Cloos and others, to advance an agenda of scientific
misconduct, having
non-scientific financial and political-social underpinnings.
E) In 2003, when the Agency became
aware that BCC Meteorites was
about to expose massive scientific misconduct by their funded
academics, they issued CFR-1275
(Investigation of Research Misconduct) for discussion and comment. BCC
Meteorites commented to the Agency and The House Science Committee,
none
of whom responded. Several months later in
October of 2003, the Agency filed CFR-1275
into the Federal Register without comment. In
actuality, CFR-1275 was a smoke screen constructed for the sole
purpose of clearing NASA of any wrongdoing should the DoJ decide to
prosecute the scientists whom they were covertly encouraging to commit
scientific misconduct by falsifiaction and fabrication. As a result of
C and D above, substantial evidence exists to show that the Agency is
an active
participant in routine intentional, extraterrestrial geologic
sample misappropriation
and/or misidentifcation to achieve a vast array of specific political,
non-scientific goals. S. Ray DeRusse
In 1982, James A. Michener published through Random
House a book titled, SPACE. The reader is encouraged to read this book
with particular emphasis on pages 419 and 429 for possible answers
regarding the purported lunar landings.
"In the Spring of 1979 I was appointed to
the NASA Advisory Council, which advises NASA, and there I met
repeatedly with men who conducted our space effort, and visited several
times the great NASA bases at which the work was done. I was allowed to
particpate in the full life of the agency. I did this uninterruptedly
for four years. My acquaintance with NASA engineers and scientists was
extensive, and to them I owe a great debt, especially those at Langley,
Wallops, Ames, Houston, Huntsville, Goddard and the Jet Propulsion
Laboratory". James A. Michener.
|
STR
B
Onet 
S P A I N
What
is CVD? Daniel M. Dobkin has a detailed tutorial
on this subject.
K/T
Geoservices, Inc.
Physical
Sciences Information
Gateway 
